AGED SOR GHUM VINEGAR vs PORTABELLA SLOPPY JOE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORTABELLA SLOPPY JOE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
AGED SOR GHUM VINEGAR: 3
vs
PORTABELLA SLOPPY JOE: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | AGED SOR GHUM VINEGAR | PORTABELLA SLOPPY JOE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 33 cal | 70 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 15.8 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | AGED SOR GHUM VINEGAR | PORTABELLA SLOPPY JOE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | AGED SOR GHUM VINEGAR | PORTABELLA SLOPPY JOE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 246 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 298 MG |