AdvancePierre Fully Cooked Down Home Charbroil Beef Salisbury Steak vs ""HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
AdvancePierre Fully Cooked Down Home Charbroil Beef Salisbury Steak wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
AdvancePierre Fully Cooked Down Home Charbroil Beef Salisbury Steak: 5
vs
""HAM: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | AdvancePierre Fully Cooked Down Home Charbroil Beef Salisbury Steak | ""HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 245 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 18.5 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 4.5 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 17 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | AdvancePierre Fully Cooked Down Home Charbroil Beef Salisbury Steak | ""HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | AdvancePierre Fully Cooked Down Home Charbroil Beef Salisbury Steak | ""HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 336 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 289 MG | 1,232 MG |