A FISHLESS TUNA vs BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
A FISHLESS TUNA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
A FISHLESS TUNA: 5
vs
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | A FISHLESS TUNA | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 93 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 21.8 g | |
| Carbs | 8.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 9.8 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | A FISHLESS TUNA | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | A FISHLESS TUNA | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 51 MG | 26 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 218 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 209 MG | 218 MG |