6 OZ CHILEAN SEA BASS vs RET BAG H&G CROAKER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
6 OZ CHILEAN SEA BASS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
6 OZ CHILEAN SEA BASS: 4
vs
RET BAG H&G CROAKER: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 6 OZ CHILEAN SEA BASS | RET BAG H&G CROAKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 3.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 6 OZ CHILEAN SEA BASS | RET BAG H&G CROAKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 6 OZ CHILEAN SEA BASS | RET BAG H&G CROAKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 15 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 254 MG | 345 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 66 MG | 58 MG |