50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS vs NATURAL CASING FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS: 4
vs
NATURAL CASING FRANKS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 240 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 12 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 10 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 14 g | 23.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 50% REDUCED FAT BEEF FRANKS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,020 MG | 786 MG |