16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL vs SEA BASS WGS 350/500 GR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL: 6
vs
SEA BASS WGS 350/500 GR: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL | SEA BASS WGS 350/500 GR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 98 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 18.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL | SEA BASS WGS 350/500 GR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 16/32 OZ S/P POLLOCK FILL | SEA BASS WGS 350/500 GR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 46 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 357 MG | 256 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 89 MG | 223 MG |