100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST vs BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST: 2
vs
BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 21.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 9.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 100% GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ARM ROAST | BACON-WRAPPED PETITE SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 26 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 218 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 4.7 MG | 0 MG |