100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA vs SAUCED MUSHROOM & GREEN BEAN RISOTTO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA: 5
vs
SAUCED MUSHROOM & GREEN BEAN RISOTTO: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA | SAUCED MUSHROOM & GREEN BEAN RISOTTO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 121 cal | 124 cal | |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 3.2 g | |
| Carbs | 22.9 g | 23.7 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 0.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA | SAUCED MUSHROOM & GREEN BEAN RISOTTO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 100% ANCIENT GRAIN STEAM IN BAG QUINOA | SAUCED MUSHROOM & GREEN BEAN RISOTTO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 46 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 127 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 7 MG | 307 MG |