WORTHINGTON vs 100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WORTHINGTON wins in 8 out of 17 nutrient categories
WORTHINGTON: 8
vs
100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WORTHINGTON | 100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 2.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 11.4 g | 5.3 g | |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WORTHINGTON | 100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 2.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Pantothenic acid | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin B-12 | 2.6 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WORTHINGTON | 100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 57 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 457 MG | 80 MG |