WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE vs KICKIN MULE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KICKIN MULE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE: 3
vs
KICKIN MULE: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE | KICKIN MULE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 36.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE | KICKIN MULE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WORCESTERSHIRE SAUCE | KICKIN MULE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,200 MG | 667 MG |