WILLIAMS & BENNETT vs THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILLIAMS & BENNETT: 3
vs
THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 477 cal | |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 65.5 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 24.1 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | THE ORIGINAL BELGIAN ALMOND THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 328 MG | 577 MG |