WILLIAMS & BENNETT vs SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILLIAMS & BENNETT: 3
vs
SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 10.3 g | |
| Carbs | 63.6 g | 58.6 g | |
| Fat | 27.3 g | 20.7 g | |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | SOFT TUSCAN AMARETTI BISCUITS TOSCAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 91 MG | 138 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 52 MG |