WILD OPHELIA vs LARGE MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD OPHELIA wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD OPHELIA: 6
vs
LARGE MARSHMALLOWS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD OPHELIA | LARGE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 525 cal | 345 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 45 g | 82.8 g | |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD OPHELIA | LARGE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD OPHELIA | LARGE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 86 MG |