WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS vs SOCKEYE SALMON WILD ALASKAN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS wins in 8 out of 12 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS: 8
vs
SOCKEYE SALMON WILD ALASKAN: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | SOCKEYE SALMON WILD ALASKAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 175 cal | |
| Protein | 24.8 g | 24.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 8.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | SOCKEYE SALMON WILD ALASKAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 2 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | SOCKEYE SALMON WILD ALASKAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 442 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 44 MG | 965 MG |