WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS vs COLD SMOKED SALMON FILLET SLICED
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS: 6
vs
COLD SMOKED SALMON FILLET SLICED: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | COLD SMOKED SALMON FILLET SLICED | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 212 cal | |
| Protein | 24.7 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 14 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | COLD SMOKED SALMON FILLET SLICED | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | COLD SMOKED SALMON FILLET SLICED | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 46 MG | 0 MG |