WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON vs TINY SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON: 4
vs
TINY SHRIMP: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON | TINY SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 129 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON | TINY SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 21 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON | TINY SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 164 MG | 107 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 311 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 306 MG | 768 MG |