WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON vs HAGOROMO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON: 7
vs
HAGOROMO: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON | HAGOROMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 129 cal | 260 cal | |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 19 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 11 g | |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 16 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON | HAGOROMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 21 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT TRADITIONAL STYLE ALASKAN RED SOCKEYE SALMON | HAGOROMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 164 MG | 40 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 311 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 306 MG | 510 MG |