WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP vs CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP: 8
vs
CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 195 cal | |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 15.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 8.9 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 10.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 7.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD-CAUGHT TEXAS GULF MEDIUM SHRIMP | CEDAR PLANKED ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 91 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 165 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 941 MG | 168 MG |