WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON FILLET WITH CEDAR PLANK vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON FILLET WITH CEDAR PLANK: 3
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON FILLET WITH CEDAR PLANK | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 82 cal | |
| Protein | 23.0 g | 14.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT SOCKEYE SALMON FILLET WITH CEDAR PLANK | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 153 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 372 MG | 53 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 80 MG | 835 MG |