WILD CAUGHT SKIN-ON FILLETS SNAPPER vs SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT SKIN-ON FILLETS SNAPPER: 2
vs
SHRIMP: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT SKIN-ON FILLETS SNAPPER | SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 119 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT SKIN-ON FILLETS SNAPPER | SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT SKIN-ON FILLETS SNAPPER | SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 22 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 402 MG | 262 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 286 MG |