WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE vs GROUND BEEF CHUCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE: 5
vs
GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86 cal | 259 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 5.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 99 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 268 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 829 MG | 67 MG |