WILD-CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON PORTION vs ECHO FALLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON PORTION wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD-CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON PORTION: 6
vs
ECHO FALLS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD-CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON PORTION | ECHO FALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 150 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 22.1 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD-CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON PORTION | ECHO FALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD-CAUGHT ALASKAN SOCKEYE SALMON PORTION | ECHO FALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 363 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 1,107 MG |