WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS vs WHOLE COOKED LOBSTER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHOLE COOKED LOBSTER wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS: 2
vs
WHOLE COOKED LOBSTER: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS | WHOLE COOKED LOBSTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 134 cal | 88 cal | |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 19.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 0.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS | WHOLE COOKED LOBSTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS | WHOLE COOKED LOBSTER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 80 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 367 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 76 MG | 488 MG |