WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS vs TUNA STEAKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TUNA STEAKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS: 4
vs
TUNA STEAKS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 11 g | 23.0 g | |
| Carbs | 26 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 11 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 220 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 470 MG | 35 MG |