WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS vs COOKED E-Z PEEL WHITE SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED E-Z PEEL WHITE SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS: 3
vs
COOKED E-Z PEEL WHITE SHRIMP: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | COOKED E-Z PEEL WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 11 g | 15.3 g | |
| Carbs | 26 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 11 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | COOKED E-Z PEEL WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | COOKED E-Z PEEL WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 220 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 470 MG | 353 MG |