WHOLE FOODS MARKET vs MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHOLE FOODS MARKET wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHOLE FOODS MARKET: 8
vs
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE FOODS MARKET | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 363 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 4.0 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 62.5 g | 76.2 g | |
| Fat | 12.1 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE FOODS MARKET | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE FOODS MARKET | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 81 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 282 MG | 36 MG |