WHOLE CASHEWS vs EMERALD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHOLE CASHEWS: 2
vs
EMERALD: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE CASHEWS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 17.1 g | |
| Carbs | 32.1 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 45.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 5.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE CASHEWS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE CASHEWS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.7 MG | 6.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 536 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 357 MG | 543 MG |