WHOLE ALMONDS vs KIRKLAND SIGNATURE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHOLE ALMONDS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHOLE ALMONDS: 7
vs
KIRKLAND SIGNATURE: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHOLE ALMONDS | KIRKLAND SIGNATURE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 13.3 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHOLE ALMONDS | KIRKLAND SIGNATURE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHOLE ALMONDS | KIRKLAND SIGNATURE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 233 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.3 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 667 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 267 MG |