WHITE RUSK TOAST vs CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
WHITE RUSK TOAST: 4
vs
CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE RUSK TOAST | CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 71.4 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE RUSK TOAST | CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE RUSK TOAST | CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 571 MG | 833 MG |