WHITE FUDGE BROWNIE SOFT BAKED COOKIES vs FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE FUDGE BROWNIE SOFT BAKED COOKIES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHITE FUDGE BROWNIE SOFT BAKED COOKIES: 6
vs
FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE FUDGE BROWNIE SOFT BAKED COOKIES | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 478 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 60.7 g | 69.6 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 21.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE FUDGE BROWNIE SOFT BAKED COOKIES | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE FUDGE BROWNIE SOFT BAKED COOKIES | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 32 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 121 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 464 MG | 348 MG |