WHITE CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW POP WITH CRYSTAL SPRINKLES vs FRANKFORD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW POP WITH CRYSTAL SPRINKLES wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHITE CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW POP WITH CRYSTAL SPRINKLES: 3
vs
FRANKFORD: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW POP WITH CRYSTAL SPRINKLES | FRANKFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 378 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 76.2 g | 93.3 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW POP WITH CRYSTAL SPRINKLES | FRANKFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW POP WITH CRYSTAL SPRINKLES | FRANKFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 83 MG | 56 MG |