WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA PLANT BASED PROTEIN BAR vs MARSHMALLOW BLONDIE SOFT BAKED TREATS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA PLANT BASED PROTEIN BAR wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA PLANT BASED PROTEIN BAR: 7
vs
MARSHMALLOW BLONDIE SOFT BAKED TREATS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA PLANT BASED PROTEIN BAR | MARSHMALLOW BLONDIE SOFT BAKED TREATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 425 cal | 391 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0.1 g | 65.2 g | |
| Fat | 15 g | 15.2 g | |
| Fiber | 5 g | 4.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA PLANT BASED PROTEIN BAR | MARSHMALLOW BLONDIE SOFT BAKED TREATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA PLANT BASED PROTEIN BAR | MARSHMALLOW BLONDIE SOFT BAKED TREATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 609 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 150 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 325 MG | 304 MG |