WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA COOKIES vs BISCOFF COOKIE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA COOKIES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA COOKIES: 5
vs
BISCOFF COOKIE: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA COOKIES | BISCOFF COOKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 484 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 6.5 g | |
| Carbs | 60.7 g | 74.2 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 19.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA COOKIES | BISCOFF COOKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE CHOCOLATE MACADAMIA COOKIES | BISCOFF COOKIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 371 MG |