WHITE CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM WITH SPRINKLES vs MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM WITH SPRINKLES wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHITE CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM WITH SPRINKLES: 4
vs
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM WITH SPRINKLES | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 529 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 64.7 g | 76.2 g | |
| Fat | 26.5 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM WITH SPRINKLES | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM WITH SPRINKLES | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS DIPPED IN DECADENT WHITE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 118 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 162 MG | 36 MG |