WHITE CHEDDAR FLAVORED CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS vs ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 13 nutrient categories
WHITE CHEDDAR FLAVORED CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS: 5
vs
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE CHEDDAR FLAVORED CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 409 cal | |
| Protein | 57.1 g | 4.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 77.3 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHITE CHEDDAR FLAVORED CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 9.1 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE CHEDDAR FLAVORED CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,857 MG | 477 MG |