WHITE CANDY MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES vs MARSHMALLOW COOKIES ROYALE PUFFS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE CANDY MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHITE CANDY MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES: 5
vs
MARSHMALLOW COOKIES ROYALE PUFFS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHITE CANDY MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES | MARSHMALLOW COOKIES ROYALE PUFFS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 450 cal | 447 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 2.6 g | |
| Carbs | 57.5 g | 71.1 g | |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 15.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHITE CANDY MACADAMIA NUT COOKIES | MARSHMALLOW COOKIES ROYALE PUFFS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 26 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 100 MG | 79 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 425 MG | 132 MG |