WHIPPED HORSERADISH SOUR CREAM vs NANG FAH TUE KUNG
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NANG FAH TUE KUNG wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
WHIPPED HORSERADISH SOUR CREAM: 2
vs
NANG FAH TUE KUNG: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHIPPED HORSERADISH SOUR CREAM | NANG FAH TUE KUNG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 222 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 22.2 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 22.2 g | 26.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHIPPED HORSERADISH SOUR CREAM | NANG FAH TUE KUNG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 48 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHIPPED HORSERADISH SOUR CREAM | NANG FAH TUE KUNG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 333 MG | 1,093 MG |