WHIPPED DRESSING vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHIPPED DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHIPPED DRESSING: 3
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHIPPED DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 13.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 46.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHIPPED DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHIPPED DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 533 MG | 567 MG |