WHIPPED DRESSING vs RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
WHIPPED DRESSING: 0
vs
RANCH DRESSING: 5
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WHIPPED DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 83 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 20 g | 20 g | Tie |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WHIPPED DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WHIPPED DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 83 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 1,033 MG |