WEGMANS vs FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
WEGMANS: 4
vs
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WEGMANS | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 469 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 68.8 g | 69.0 g | |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WEGMANS | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WEGMANS | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 62 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 203 MG | 172 MG |