WATERMELON FLAVOR PIKA SLICE CHILI COVERED HARD CANDY LOLLIPOP vs SPOOKY SWEETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WATERMELON FLAVOR PIKA SLICE CHILI COVERED HARD CANDY LOLLIPOP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
WATERMELON FLAVOR PIKA SLICE CHILI COVERED HARD CANDY LOLLIPOP: 4
vs
SPOOKY SWEETS: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WATERMELON FLAVOR PIKA SLICE CHILI COVERED HARD CANDY LOLLIPOP | SPOOKY SWEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 383 cal | 385 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 93.3 g | 92.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WATERMELON FLAVOR PIKA SLICE CHILI COVERED HARD CANDY LOLLIPOP | SPOOKY SWEETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 90 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 910 MG | 103 MG |