WATERHILL vs SAUSAGE PATTIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SAUSAGE PATTIES wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
WATERHILL: 0
vs
SAUSAGE PATTIES: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WATERHILL | SAUSAGE PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 545 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 9.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 54.6 g | 39.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WATERHILL | SAUSAGE PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | WATERHILL | SAUSAGE PATTIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,045 MG | 1,179 MG |