WASABI BAKED CRUNCHY CHICKPEAS vs BANDAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WASABI BAKED CRUNCHY CHICKPEAS wins in 9 out of 10 nutrient categories
WASABI BAKED CRUNCHY CHICKPEAS: 9
vs
BANDAR: 0
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | WASABI BAKED CRUNCHY CHICKPEAS | BANDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 8.2 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 17.9 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | WASABI BAKED CRUNCHY CHICKPEAS | BANDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 19.3 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | WASABI BAKED CRUNCHY CHICKPEAS | BANDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 357 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 318 MG | 250 MG |