VUKOO vs COTTONDALE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
VUKOO wins in 9 out of 11 nutrient categories
VUKOO: 9
vs
COTTONDALE: 0
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | VUKOO | COTTONDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 341 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 47.1 g | 64.3 g | |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 16.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | VUKOO | COTTONDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | VUKOO | COTTONDALE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 176 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 459 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 112 MG | 107 MG |