VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM vs TRADITIONAL CHICKEN BOLOGNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM: 3
vs
TRADITIONAL CHICKEN BOLOGNA: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM | TRADITIONAL CHICKEN BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 128 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 17.0 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 6.4 g | 3.1 g | |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 21.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM | TRADITIONAL CHICKEN BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM | TRADITIONAL CHICKEN BOLOGNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 681 MG | 1,062 MG |