VEGETARIAN TUNA SUB vs VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
VEGETARIAN TUNA SUB wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
VEGETARIAN TUNA SUB: 5
vs
VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | VEGETARIAN TUNA SUB | VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 220 cal | 260 cal | |
| Protein | 11.5 g | 15.6 g | |
| Carbs | 21.5 g | 27.3 g | |
| Fat | 9.5 g | 10.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | VEGETARIAN TUNA SUB | VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | VEGETARIAN TUNA SUB | VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 30 MG | 181 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 345 MG | 675 MG |