VALU TIME vs SNICKERDOODLE SOFT COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SNICKERDOODLE SOFT COOKIES wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
VALU TIME: 1
vs
SNICKERDOODLE SOFT COOKIES: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | VALU TIME | SNICKERDOODLE SOFT COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 462 cal | 440 cal | |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 4 g | |
| Carbs | 73.1 g | 72 g | |
| Fat | 17.3 g | 16 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | VALU TIME | SNICKERDOODLE SOFT COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | VALU TIME | SNICKERDOODLE SOFT COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 16 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.8 MG | 4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 92 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 385 MG | 280 MG |