UNCURED GLAZED SMOKED SAUSAGE LINKS vs HATFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HATFIELD wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
UNCURED GLAZED SMOKED SAUSAGE LINKS: 2
vs
HATFIELD: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED GLAZED SMOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 298 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 11.9 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 6.0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 26.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED GLAZED SMOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED GLAZED SMOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,190 MG | 946 MG |