UNCURED COOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGE vs CHEDDAR HOT LINKS SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED COOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
UNCURED COOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 6
vs
CHEDDAR HOT LINKS SAUSAGE: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED COOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGE | CHEDDAR HOT LINKS SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 169 cal | 310 cal | |
| Protein | 18.3 g | 11.9 g | |
| Carbs | 2.8 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 9.9 g | 23.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED COOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGE | CHEDDAR HOT LINKS SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED COOKED CHICKEN SAUSAGE | CHEDDAR HOT LINKS SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 28 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 803 MG | 762 MG |