UNCURED CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS vs HOT SAGEY RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HOT SAGEY RINGS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
UNCURED CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
HOT SAGEY RINGS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | HOT SAGEY RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 292 cal | 411 cal | |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 6.2 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 24.6 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | HOT SAGEY RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED CLASSIC BEEF FRANKS | HOT SAGEY RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 969 MG | 857 MG |